<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ATI HD 5870 + NV GT 220 In-Depth PhysX Benchmarks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gamephys.com/game-physics/ati-hd-5870-nv-gt-220-in-depth-physx-benchmarks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gamephys.com/game-physics/ati-hd-5870-nv-gt-220-in-depth-physx-benchmarks/</link>
	<description>The Video Game Physics Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 03:29:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alec</title>
		<link>http://www.gamephys.com/game-physics/ati-hd-5870-nv-gt-220-in-depth-physx-benchmarks/comment-page-1/#comment-958</link>
		<dc:creator>Alec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 16:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gamephys.com/?p=466#comment-958</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[seriously, 
Nvidia pays big amount of cash to ensure that their PhysX comes in many games. This ruins the gameplay for ATI Cards. :( example: try playing Metro 2033 with 2x Radeon HD 5970, you&#039;ll get get 10 fps because ATI doesn&#039;t support PhysX.

At the moment, ATI leads on the graphics cards market with price and prestation, but Nvidia ruins em with their PhysX]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>seriously,<br />
Nvidia pays big amount of cash to ensure that their PhysX comes in many games. This ruins the gameplay for ATI Cards. <img src='http://www.gamephys.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' />  example: try playing Metro 2033 with 2x Radeon HD 5970, you&#8217;ll get get 10 fps because ATI doesn&#8217;t support PhysX.</p>
<p>At the moment, ATI leads on the graphics cards market with price and prestation, but Nvidia ruins em with their PhysX</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alec</title>
		<link>http://www.gamephys.com/game-physics/ati-hd-5870-nv-gt-220-in-depth-physx-benchmarks/comment-page-1/#comment-601</link>
		<dc:creator>Alec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gamephys.com/?p=466#comment-601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[seriously, &lt;br&gt;Nvidia pays big amount of cash to ensure that their PhysX comes in many games. This ruins the gameplay for ATI Cards. :( example: try playing Metro 2033 with 2x Radeon HD 5970, you&#039;ll get get 10 fps because ATI doesn&#039;t support PhysX.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;At the moment, ATI leads on the graphics cards market with price and prestation, but Nvidia ruins em with their PhysX]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>seriously, <br />Nvidia pays big amount of cash to ensure that their PhysX comes in many games. This ruins the gameplay for ATI Cards. <img src='http://www.gamephys.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' />  example: try playing Metro 2033 with 2x Radeon HD 5970, you&#39;ll get get 10 fps because ATI doesn&#39;t support PhysX.</p>
<p>At the moment, ATI leads on the graphics cards market with price and prestation, but Nvidia ruins em with their PhysX</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
